The truth is, over the course of your career, you’re going
to get on the bad side of reporters. Sometimes because of mistakes you make,
and sometimes because you’re following the directive of your company or client.
When things go south, companies often put the PR person in front of the media
to help give distance for executives, but also because they can make an easy
scapegoat if the message falls flat. I remember a time, over a decade ago, that
a company I was working for was announcing an acquisition. The chief financial
officer wanted the news to be above the fold in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ)
and to do that, we had to offer them an exclusive. I argued against the
exclusive because I didn’t think we needed it. We had great traction with the
WSJ, New York Times, Financial Times and all the wires. Given the attention the
company was getting, and the size of the acquisition, everyone was going to
cover it. If we gave an exclusive to the WSJ, we would alienate other reporters
following the company and that would hurt us in the short run and over time, if
the company hit a rough patch. I lost the argument and as soon as the news hit
the wire at midnight my phone was ringing. Words like trust, relationship,
betrayal, etc., were spit at me by top reporters from the rest of the major
outlets and none of them covered the news. Some of those relationships I was
able to repair over time but some of them still won’t talk to me today, over
thirteen years later.
The good news is you move on, and so do reporters. Their
beats change, the publications they write for shift and time eventually heals
all wounds…hopefully. And what we do as PR people change.
On the flip side, I have relationships with key media like
Om Malik that date back to my time at InFocus and his time at Forbes. We’ve
maintained our friendship and good working relationship through three
companies, the start of my firm and his moves leading up to founding GigaOm. The same holds true for Scott
Raynovich, who I met when he was at Red Herring, then moved to Light Reading
and eventually to his own site, The Rayno
Report. And the person that I probably consider one of my closest friends
in the media world, Carol Wilson, whom I’ve known since her days at Interactive Week, then NetEconomy, Telephony and now Light Reading.
These relationships exist because we’ve connected outside of
the pitch process. We’ve shared meals outside of a briefing, watched ball
games, shared stories about family and even, at one event, got to meet Tommy
Lasorda. These folks, and many more, take briefings because they know when I approach
them it’s relevant to their coverage area or because it’s something I know
they’ll find interesting, even if it’s not a perfect fit.
This level of trust and mutual respect takes time to build.
There are other reporters I’ve known the same amount of time but don’t have
this type of relationship with because I don’t like them and they don’t like
me. But that happens and you can’t sweat it as a PR professional and still survive
and thrive. The key is to find the people you like and respect, and work to
develop relationships that can last your entire career.
It is ironic, receiving the alert for this article on the day I publish a blog depicting why PRactitioners and Marketing professionals need to be closer in the workplace. As a, soon to be, PR graduate, I know that fostering relationships is what we have been conditioned to do. If a marketer thinks they can develop a successful campaign without this and that their PR staff is just for emergencies, they'd better make sure they keep them around; Those emergencies are not far off.
ReplyDeletehttp://yourmorningespresso.blogspot.com/2014/03/what-can-adobe-digital-index-tell-you.html